The enigma of riskJohn Leiper - Senior Portfolio Manager
Risk is defined as a ‘situation involving exposure to danger’. Risk-averse investors would rationally seek to minimise this in their portfolios. In most cases, ‘danger’ refers to the possibility of capital loss. Alternatively, risk could represent unacceptably low returns. In each instance risk relates to performance.
Performance and risk are two sides of the same coin. Investors should take on additional risk only if they are compensated for doing so by the expectation of higher returns. Because ‘expected’ returns refer to the future, which is unknown, assessment of risk can be highly subjective.
Alternative definitions of risk include ‘volatility’ or the ‘deviation’ of returns from an average. Such statistical measures are backward looking and make mathematical assumptions which may not reflect the real world. This came to light during the 2007-2008 financial crisis when financial institutions significantly underestimated sub-prime mortgage risk in the US.
Risk means there are multiple potential outcomes, with uncertainty over which occur and, therefore, the potential for loss when disadvantageous ones do. To provide an example, a ‘lucky’ investor might generate strong returns in a bull market but take on significant risk doing so. Meanwhile, a ‘prudent’ investor delivers similar returns for far less risk. Had the environment turned negative, risk would have become a far greater factor. Warren Buffet summed it up best when he said, “only when the tide goes out do you discover who’s been swimming naked”.
Higher risk comes from higher prices, or more specifically, insufficient compensation for exposure taken. Because markets follow cycles, investor perceptions can become distorted over long periods of time. The belief that risk is low, that investment will surely lead to profits, an absence of caution, a diminished fear of loss and the over exuberance of missing out, are all clear signs of heightened risk.
Risk should not be avoided. It should be intelligently managed, or controlled, to maximise returns. Tavistock Wealth controls risk by targeting long-term volatility across the risk progressive Centralised Investment Proposition. Whilst historical volatility can be observed and monitored against this target range, ongoing adherence depends on future returns.
Volatility in the ACUMEN Portfolios and Tavistock PB PROFILES is slightly below the long-run target range. This is because recently, market volatility has dropped to all-time lows. However, we believe volatility will return to historical averages. Portfolio volatility is also below IA sector averages, yet performance since inception remains above average. This suggests superior risk-adjusted returns.
An alternative would be to shift further along the risk curve. However, riskier investments do not reliably produce higher returns. If they did, they wouldn’t be ‘risky’.
In our view, current stretched valuations result in risk being decreasingly associated with higher expected returns and increasingly linked to lower returns. The likelihood is therefore that taking increased risk now will lead to the possibility of higher than expected future losses.
This investment Blog is published and provided for informational purposes only. The information in the Blog constitutes the author’s own opinions. None of the information contained in the Blog constitutes a recommendation that any particular investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Source of data: Tavistock Wealth Limited.
Want to know more about the Equity Markets?
Please contact us here:
On Monday afternoon, global stock markets soared on the news BioNTech and Pfizer had created a coronavirus vaccine which proved 90% effective based on initial trial results.
The narrative, heading into the US election, was a ‘Blue Wave’ victory for the Democrats. Polls and betting odds favoured a Biden win and a Senate majority and investors positioned accordingly.
The ACUMEN Portfolios continued their strong run throughout October, largely outperforming the market composite benchmark and IA sectors (used for peer group comparison purposes) which lost ground across the board.
With the US election just 8 days away, financial markets are following the polls and pricing in a Biden win. The prospect for a Democratic clean sweep has contributed to the rising ‘Blue Wave’ narrative benefiting those companies that stand to benefit from Democratic party policy.
Welcome to the Q4-2020 ‘Quarterly Perspectives’ publication.
On Tuesday Fed Chairman, Jerome Powell, made a speech at the National Association for Business Economics, during which he implied the government should err on the side of caution and provide too much stimulus rather than too little.
Our Chief Investment Officer, John Leiper, was recently invited to provide his valuable insights as part of ETF Stream’s video conference livestream: “Beyond Beta Europe Digital: Smart beta unwrapped”.
Saturday Night Live has a reputation for expertly parodying presidential election debates. My all-time favourite is Al Gore (Darrell Hammond) versus George Bush (Will Ferrell) and this year didn’t disappoint with expert performances from Donald Trump (Alec Baldwin) and Joe Biden (Jim Carrey).
Our Chief Investment Officer, John Leiper, was recently invited to provide his valuable insights into emerging markets as part of ETF Stream’s video conference livestream: “Big Call: Emerging Markets”.
Last week the FTSE Russell decided to include Chinese government bonds in its flagship World Government Bond Index (WGBI). The decision follows similar moves, from JP Morgan and Bloomberg, and a failed attempt to do so just one year prior which resulted in a number of reforms, to increase accessibility and currency trading options, that ultimately paved the way for benchmark admission.
The following is an abbreviated version of my recent article ‘A Deep Dive Into… UK Equities’ for Investment Week magazine. Follow the link and read my views on page 17.
In last week’s blog we discussed the ‘Nasdaq whale’, Softbank, and the role it played, alongside an army of retail investors, driving tech prices ever higher prior to the recent correction. These short-term ‘technical’ flows are driven by the options market as traders look to hedge their underlying exposure, amplifying moves both lower and higher.