The enigma of riskJohn Leiper - Senior Portfolio Manager
Risk is defined as a ‘situation involving exposure to danger’. Risk-averse investors would rationally seek to minimise this in their portfolios. In most cases, ‘danger’ refers to the possibility of capital loss. Alternatively, risk could represent unacceptably low returns. In each instance risk relates to performance.
Performance and risk are two sides of the same coin. Investors should take on additional risk only if they are compensated for doing so by the expectation of higher returns. Because ‘expected’ returns refer to the future, which is unknown, assessment of risk can be highly subjective.
Alternative definitions of risk include ‘volatility’ or the ‘deviation’ of returns from an average. Such statistical measures are backward looking and make mathematical assumptions which may not reflect the real world. This came to light during the 2007-2008 financial crisis when financial institutions significantly underestimated sub-prime mortgage risk in the US.
Risk means there are multiple potential outcomes, with uncertainty over which occur and, therefore, the potential for loss when disadvantageous ones do. To provide an example, a ‘lucky’ investor might generate strong returns in a bull market but take on significant risk doing so. Meanwhile, a ‘prudent’ investor delivers similar returns for far less risk. Had the environment turned negative, risk would have become a far greater factor. Warren Buffet summed it up best when he said, “only when the tide goes out do you discover who’s been swimming naked”.
Higher risk comes from higher prices, or more specifically, insufficient compensation for exposure taken. Because markets follow cycles, investor perceptions can become distorted over long periods of time. The belief that risk is low, that investment will surely lead to profits, an absence of caution, a diminished fear of loss and the over exuberance of missing out, are all clear signs of heightened risk.
Risk should not be avoided. It should be intelligently managed, or controlled, to maximise returns. Tavistock Wealth controls risk by targeting long-term volatility across the risk progressive Centralised Investment Proposition. Whilst historical volatility can be observed and monitored against this target range, ongoing adherence depends on future returns.
Volatility in the ACUMEN Portfolios and Tavistock PB PROFILES is slightly below the long-run target range. This is because recently, market volatility has dropped to all-time lows. However, we believe volatility will return to historical averages. Portfolio volatility is also below IA sector averages, yet performance since inception remains above average. This suggests superior risk-adjusted returns.
An alternative would be to shift further along the risk curve. However, riskier investments do not reliably produce higher returns. If they did, they wouldn’t be ‘risky’.
In our view, current stretched valuations result in risk being decreasingly associated with higher expected returns and increasingly linked to lower returns. The likelihood is therefore that taking increased risk now will lead to the possibility of higher than expected future losses.
This investment Blog is published and provided for informational purposes only. The information in the Blog constitutes the author’s own opinions. None of the information contained in the Blog constitutes a recommendation that any particular investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Source of data: Tavistock Wealth Limited.
Want to know more about the Equity Markets?
Please contact us here:
Welcome to the Q1-2019 ‘Quarterly Perspectives’ publication, which aims to explain our outlook for financial markets over the rest of the year.read more
Christopher Peel, our Chief Investment Officer, discusses the environment in U.K. investment before Brexit deal on CNBC.read more
Tavistcok CIO Sees a good Environment to Be Long Risk Assets.read more
Christopher Peel talks about Brexit and its potential impact on Sterling.read more
The average client invests for the medium to long term. Of course they’ll experience ups and downs, but the aim is always to increase the value over time, right?read more
Speaking on Bloomberg, Christopher Peel discusses the recent decline in the price of oil and the potential impact on U.S. High Yieldread more
Welcome to the Q4-2018 ‘Quarterly Perspectives’ publication, which aims to explain our outlook for financial markets over the rest of the year.read more
Earlier in the week, US equities suffered their worst declines since February 2018.read more
Christopher Peel talks about Brexit & Sterling and the Bear Market in Bonds on CNBC.read more
Christopher Peel gives his views to Reuters and Morningstar on Global financial Markets.read more
Christopher Peel speaks to Daybreak Europe’s Markus Karlsson about why he’s long-term positive on the trade story, and about the state of affairs at the Federal Reserve, after Wednesday’s Fed minutes.read more
Christopher Peel provides his quarterly perspectives for Q3 2018 on CNBC.read more