Unhedged portfolios; performing well over the past 12 months, but at what cost?

Ben Raven - Director
Retail clients investing in globally diversified portfolios have enjoyed fantastic returns over the past year.

Equity markets have made significant gains all over the world; Japan has seen the Nikkei 225 return 25% whilst in Europe the MSCI European Small Cap Index TR rose 24%. Not to be left out, the S&P 500 jumped 28% and the FTSE All-Share Index rose 31%.

So, a UK retail client with exposure to Asia, Europe, America and the UK would have made consistently good profits across their entire equity portfolio. In fact, if a client had an equal allocation to each of the 4 geographical areas their aggregate return would be somewhere in the region of +27%. What is interesting however, is that UK clients with unhedged overseas exposure have actually made considerably more than this over the past 12 months.

The returns I have quoted are for the indices in question, in local currency terms.

That is to say the Nikkei 225 returned 25% in Japanese Yen terms, the MSCI European Small Cap Index gained 24% in Euro terms, and so on. A UK client however does not invest in the Yen share class of a Japanese equity fund, nor in the Euro share class of a European equity fund.
They invest in the GBP share class.
When we look at the returns of the GBP share classes vs the local currency share classes – it tells a different tale. Using the relevant IA sector for each geographical region we can see the sector return (the average manager trying to outperform the benchmark) in local currency terms and in GBP terms:
As we can see the UK investor, using unhedged GBP share classes, would have achieved an aggregate portfolio return of 38.17% when the aggregate return of the underlying equity markets, in local currency terms, was only 24.85%.

How does this happen?

It is because over the same 12-month period the GBP has depreciated vs the Japanese Yen, the Euro and the US Dollar.

A UK client’s return of 38.17% is made up of the 24.85% return of the underlying equity markets and a 13.32% ‘boost’ from the currency markets. This ‘boost’ is equal to 54% of their original return – in other words the UK client has achieved 154% of the return they should have made.

I say “should have made“, because these clients would have been told they were investing in an equity portfolio. These clients would have been told how their equity portfolio comes with an expected level of risk and an expected level of return. In our example, the client may have been told the historical return of their portfolio was 25%. They may also have been told the portfolio would subject them to a risk profile of 8 on a scale of 1-10. In reality, the client’s portfolio; should the overseas exposure be unhedged, will not experience a long-term average return of 25% nor a long-term average volatility of 8. An unhedged portfolio is no longer just exposed to the equity markets, and for a UK investor, will be hugely impacted by what GBP is doing against every other currency represented within the client’s portfolio.

In this example, and over the past year…

The client is able to benefit from the gains made through the depreciation in the GBP, even though it was not part of their intended strategy. Neither was it what they necessarily signed up for when they agreed to invest in an equity portfolio.

Consider however, if the GBP had rallied instead of depreciating over the past 12 months, and the client had then received a return of only 11.54% (24.85% less the 13.32% currency impact). In this instance the adviser may have a very difficult time explaining why the return was lower than it should have been. The client signed up to a global equity portfolio. The underlying markets produced an aggregate gain of 24.85%. The client was not told how much currency risk they were exposed to, nor how much it could impact their return or the excess volatility they would experience in order to generate that return. In this instance, the client would have been exposed to a type of risk they were not made aware of that resulted in a lower return than they were entitled to expect.

For as long as the GBP has been falling against other currencies, the returns achieved by UK retail clients have been ‘boosted’. This is a long-term trend that dates back to the days of $2:£1. However, those financial advisers that are currently recommending globally diversified, unhedged portfolios, should be mindful that the GBP will not fall forever.

Like any market, currency markets move in both directions. When the GBP rallies, UK retail clients invested in unhedged portfolios will suffer in terms of performance. Many will also realise that they are being exposed to a type of risk they did not sign up for. They will ask their financial adviser for the reason why.

The answer you give is down to you…

This investment Blog is published and provided for informational purposes only. The information in the Blog constitutes the author’s own opinions. None of the information contained in the Blog constitutes a recommendation that any particular investment strategy is suitable for any specific person. Source of data: Tavistock Wealth Limited and Lipper for Investment Management. Date of data: 10thFebruary 2017.

Want to know more about Currency Hedging?

Please contact us here:

5 + 2 =

Recent blogs
The Return of Inflation

The Return of Inflation

Quantitative easing, or QE, is where a central bank creates money to buy bonds. The goal is to keep interest rates low and to stimulate the economy during periods of economic stress.

read more
The Powell Pivot 2.0

The Powell Pivot 2.0

In January 2019 Jerome Powell pivoted from a policy of interest rate increases and balance sheet cuts to interest rate cuts and, later that year, balance sheet expansion.

read more
Don’t Fight The Fed

Don’t Fight The Fed

Over the last decade, the Fed has increasingly resorted to unconventional monetary policy, such as quantitative easing, or QE, to stimulate the economy.

read more